Tech

Google's New Shopping Ads Appear To Be A Huge Success — But Amazon's Not Buying Them

Read in app
larry page jeff bezos
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and Google CEO Larry Page  Wikimedia, CC

Google's new shopping ads appear to be a big success, and they may be forcing retailers like Walmart and Amazon to spend more in the online shopping wars, at least according to data collected by Brian Pitz and his team of analysts at Jefferies Research.

The number of Amazon-owned brands' shopping ads running on Google has nearly tripled in the past 6 months, and Amazon brands have doubled their market share, Jefferies says.

Amazon says Amazon itself hasn't bought any of the new-format ads, and Jefferies has clarified that its analysis includes ads placed by Amazon's subsidiaries. In a message to Business Insider, the Jefferies team said the ads it attributes to "Amazon" include ads from Zappos, Diapers.com, Wag.com Soap.com, and BeautyBar.com.

This apparent change in behavior comes after Google introduced a new search product that — a cynic might argue — was deliberately designed to screw Amazon out of its high-ranking organic (unpaid) search results.

Google introduced the new paid format last year. Whenever Google figured you were searching for something shopping-related, say "Ugg Boots," it displayed so-called "product-listing ads" (PLAs) instead of regular text links.

Those links look like this, in this graphic Jefferies produced in the summer of 2013:

Google PLAs Jefferies
Jefferies

Any online retailer can buy them. When used correctly, they display retailers wares in big, clickable boxes on top of the free organic results. Google's other search ads are off to the side, and are slightly less visible.

Jefferies says PLAs bring in $9 in sales for every $1 they cost.

In the early part of 2013, Amazon's search results were pushed down to less visible areas of Google's pages, Jefferies' notes say. In June, Amazon was only the 11th biggest user of PLAs. It ran 1,752 of them, according to Jefferies' sample of 150,000 searches, and about 1% of all PLAs displayed by Google were for Amazon.

Back in the summer, Business Insider argued that the PLA ads were a huge threat to Amazon because they moved Amazon's normally very good search results down the page in favor of any retailer who paid to appear above them.

Fast-forward to November — the crucial post-Thanksgiving/pre-Xmas holiday shopping period — and Amazon brands were the No. 7 user of PLAs, Jefferies' most recent note says. In the sample, Amazon had 5,232 ads, about 2% of all PLA inventory:

Google PLA Jefferies
Jefferies

It's not clear whether eBay, Amazon, and the other retailers here are buying Google's PLAs because Google has pushed down their organic search results (thus forcing them to) or because they find the new ads effective. Either way, they're buying a lot more of them than they used to. Jefferies believes these ads will boost Google's coffers in Q4:

In the US, the number of Product Listing Advertisements has increased 99% Y/Y to 236K – the most ever. In the UK, the number of PLA ads increased +130% Y/Y since March as we tracked 198K PLAs in our current study – again, the most ever.

... Given our findings, we think Product Listing Ad (PLA) format could drive upside during the important holiday quarter because PLAs generate more revenue for Google compared to the legacy text-based ‘blue link’ search ads.

Here's what the increase in PLAs on Google looks like over time (below). Nearly 40% of search results in the sample now lead to a PLA:

Google PLA Jefferies
Jefferies

Clarification: The original version of this story did not include comments from Amazon, or Jefferies response to Amazon's criticism. 

Disclosure: The author owns Google stock.

Read next

Jim is the former editor-in-chief of Insider's news division.Previously he was the founding editor of Business Insider UK.He has also been managing editor at Adweek, an advertising columnist at CBS Interactive, and a Knight-Bagehot Fellow at Columbia Business School. His work has appeared in Slate, Salon, The Independent, MTV, The Nation and AOL.His investigative journalism changed the law in the US First Circuit Court of Appeals (U.S. v. Kravetz), the Third Circuit Court of Appeals (North Jersey Media v. Ashcroft), New Jersey (In Re El-Atriss), and New York State (Mosallem v. Berenson).The US Supreme Court cited his work on the death penalty in the concurrence to Baze v. Rees, on the issue of whether lethal injection is cruel or unusual.He won the Neal award for business journalism in 2005 for a series investigating bribes and kickbacks in the advertising business.Here's a selection of his past stories:    The alleged betrayal in these photos, texts, and emails cost Snapchat $158 million    Inside the conspiracy that forced Dov Charney out of American Apparel    The Evolution of Ev: The creator of Twitter, Blogger, and Medium has a plan to fix the mess he made of the internet    THE "KNOCK-IN SHORT": Nigel Farage and the massive bet against the pound on the night of the Brexit vote    eBay worked with the FBI to put its top affiliate marketer in prison    How Dunkin Donuts ended up hiring a psychotic credit card thief as director of communications    BEJEWELED: The definitive, illustrated history of the most underrated game ever   • The CEO of Publicis told us how he stared down a furious internal rebellion to bet the future of his $11 billion company on artificial intelligence   • FBX: The billion-dollar Facebook business that never happened   • The €150 million check-kiting scam that bankrupted Leo Burnett in Greece   • My Polaroids of the September 11 attacks led me into America's secret court system for terrorist suspects   • YouTube deleted 130 rap videos to help police fight street gangs responsible for thousands of stabbingsDisclosure: I own shares of Twitter (TWTR).