Tech

Tim Cook did something unusual on last night's earnings call, sending a signal about Apple's shrinking universe

Tim Cooke
REUTERS/Robert Galbraith
Read in app
  • Tim Cook refused to talk about "Android switchers" on Apple's earnings call Thursday night.
  • iPhone sales have gone into decline despite the launch of the iPhone X.
  • Apple showed revenue growth only because of the high price of the iPhone X.
  • This signals danger for Apple: It is charging more, in a shrinking universe, for a product that may no longer be observably better than its cheaper rivals.


Apple CEO Tim Cook did something really unusual on Thursday night's earnings call, and it sends a signal about the iPhone X's effect on the company's business: He refused to answer a question about "Android switchers."

For years, Cook has given analysts some perspective on the number of people switching from Android phones to iPhones. On one call in 2015, he mentioned "Android switchers" five times.

But not Thursday night.

About two-thirds of the way through the call, the analyst Laura Martin of Needham & Company asked Cook, "Switchers in the quarter, you often give us switchers."

Cook responded: "It is so early on this product cycle, particularly with the iPhone X only starting in November, that we do not feel we have data at this point that would be very meaningful to share. And so I'll punt that question until next time around."

It is difficult to believe that Apple suddenly doesn't have "meaningful" data on how many people are choosing iPhone over Android.

The top-line numbers, of course, were negative: The launch of the iPhone X — which costs about $1,000 (and £1,000 in the UK) — sent unit sales into a 1% decline:

Apple iphone sales and yoy growth 4q17
BI Intelligence

That is an embarrassing slide given the flagship device was launched only a few weeks ago. Historically, the last quarter has always been Apple's biggest — it's when the sexy new iPhone is always launched.

Not this time.

This problem is not of Apple's making, of course. The smartphone market globally is now fully saturated, and sales have gone into decline, as this chart from the Asian investment bank CLSA shows:

global smartphone market share q4 2017 by unit shipments
CLSA

Historically, Apple has always underperformed the market. Its iPhone growth is almost always less than the growth of the market as a whole.

This chart from Deutsche Bank illustrates the problem. Apple is unable to defy gravity:

Smartphone unit market growth v Apple Q3 2017 Deutsche Bank
Deutsche Bank

Apple was able to show rising revenue only because the high price of the iPhone X boosted dollar sales. The average selling price of the iPhone is $796 (£560), at least $100 (£70) more than it used to be:

Apple iphone ASP 4q17
BI Intelligence

The obvious conclusion here is that Apple is selling fewer iPhones at higher prices. The size of its universe is shrinking, though it is charging its remaining customers more.

That sounds bad, but historically Apple has comforted itself with its massive "installed base" of older iPhone users. Those phones last on average three years and are heavily used to buy apps, music, and movies via iTunes and the App Store. Apple's Services business is often regarded as the great new savior of the company, because it can — in theory — be expanded even if Apple doesn't expand its universe of actual devices.

But even Services stalled Thursday night:

Apple services revenue and yoy growth 4q17
BI Intelligence

There was year-on-year growth, but not quarter-on-quarter growth. Services usually grows sequentially in Apple's fiscal first quarter. Not this time. Services declined as a percentage of total sales, too, falling from over 15% of sales down to 10%.

None of these developments signal anything good for Apple.

While it is certainly the case that Apple has always creamed off the high-end customers, and reaped the profits, the price of the iPhone X appears to have tested even the company's most loyal fans. Why buy a great iPhone for $1,000 when you can get a pretty-much-just-as-good one for hundreds less?

Finally, the universe outside Apple has also changed dramatically. Three or four years ago, Android phones were noticeably not as good as iPhones. There was an obvious justification to choose iPhone over Android: iPhones were more reliable, and the camera on the phone was often better. But now Google's Pixel phones and Samsung's Galaxy and Note lines have caught up. iPhone users are often surprised at how much they like high-end Androids. And those Androids are usually cheaper than the iPhone X.

It's not until you look at global market share that you realize just how few people use iPhones. Of 10 regions tracked by Kantar, Android has more than 70% market share in six:

Apple ios android market share by region january 2018
Kantar

This is the danger for Apple: It is charging more, in a shrinking universe, for a product that may no longer be observably better than its cheaper rivals.

That is one possible explanation for why Cook didn't want to talk about the switchers Thursday night.

Read next

Jim is the former editor-in-chief of Insider's news division.Previously he was the founding editor of Business Insider UK.He has also been managing editor at Adweek, an advertising columnist at CBS Interactive, and a Knight-Bagehot Fellow at Columbia Business School. His work has appeared in Slate, Salon, The Independent, MTV, The Nation and AOL.His investigative journalism changed the law in the US First Circuit Court of Appeals (U.S. v. Kravetz), the Third Circuit Court of Appeals (North Jersey Media v. Ashcroft), New Jersey (In Re El-Atriss), and New York State (Mosallem v. Berenson).The US Supreme Court cited his work on the death penalty in the concurrence to Baze v. Rees, on the issue of whether lethal injection is cruel or unusual.He won the Neal award for business journalism in 2005 for a series investigating bribes and kickbacks in the advertising business.Here's a selection of his past stories:   • The alleged betrayal in these photos, texts, and emails cost Snapchat $158 million   • Inside the conspiracy that forced Dov Charney out of American Apparel   • The Evolution of Ev: The creator of Twitter, Blogger, and Medium has a plan to fix the mess he made of the internet   • THE "KNOCK-IN SHORT": Nigel Farage and the massive bet against the pound on the night of the Brexit vote   • eBay worked with the FBI to put its top affiliate marketer in prison   • How Dunkin Donuts ended up hiring a psychotic credit card thief as director of communications   • BEJEWELED: The definitive, illustrated history of the most underrated game ever   • The CEO of Publicis told us how he stared down a furious internal rebellion to bet the future of his $11 billion company on artificial intelligence   • FBX: The billion-dollar Facebook business that never happened   • The €150 million check-kiting scam that bankrupted Leo Burnett in Greece   • My Polaroids of the September 11 attacks led me into America's secret court system for terrorist suspects   • YouTube deleted 130 rap videos to help police fight street gangs responsible for thousands of stabbingsDisclosure: I own shares of Twitter (TWTR).