Tech

Apple is in the middle of a 'super cycle' that might hurt sales in China this year

Read in app
big trouble in little china
20th Century Fox

Apple's iPhone 6 has been so successful — it's the single-biggest selling phone of the year — that it might be creating a "super cycle" that will cause some temporary trouble for Apple in the second half of this year, especially in China.

The "problem" — and it's one of those problems that is good to have — is that so many people have bought an iPhone 6 that it may weaken demand for the new iPhone 6S/iPhone 6S Plus that Apple is expected to launch in September, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch analyst Wamsi Mohan and his team.

If everyone who wants a new iPhone already has iPhone 6, they're unlikely to ditch it after only a few months of use. So maybe Apple's next year of sales is going to be softer, Mohan argues. "The iPhone 6/6 plus represents a super cycle, in our opinion, demand is being pulled in from the next year, and we see the December quarter of 2014 as the peak shipment quarter for iPhones until the potential iPhone 7 release in Sep 2016," his note to investors from last night says.

Here are a couple of charts that illustrate that problem.

First, iPhone sales in China are becoming a much more important part of Apple's sales than they used to be.

Apple is becoming more and more dependent on China:

iphone china
BAML

Now, with demand for iPhones temporarily sated, Apple is losing market share against Android phones again. While demand and share cycles are cyclical, note that over the long term Apple's share of all phones sold is fairly unpredictable and lumpy.

Apple's market share in China is not guaranteed:

China iphone
BAML

"The iPhone sales over the past 3 quarters combined with the replacement rates (see above) suggest that there was a significant acceleration of replacements driven by the iPhone 6/6+, which has since tailed off sharply, offset by very strong new user adoption," Mohan writes. "The stronger new user growth is bullish overall (installed base grows larger over time) but also makes the quarterly sales more volatile. We view this latter dynamic at significant risk given the headwind being created by the stronger dollar, and broader economic uncertainty which can lead to lower sales from large markets like China."

What might that look like?

Well, a good guide is what happened to Apple in the post 2012 period, when the company released a small-sized iPhone 5S when sales of large-sized Androids (like the Galaxy S4) became huge. Apple did OK, but because the 5S wasn't a great improvement on the 5, and because there were more interesting Android alternatives, Apple's sales growth went into a trough.

You can see that trough on this chart from BI Intelligence (below).

The iPhone 5S global sales trough:

bii iphone sales growth 2q15 1 apple
BI Intelligence

There are two ways to interpret that 2013-2014 trough. You can say that this was when Apple appeared to lose the initiative, giving Samsung momentum it never should have never had. In this theory, Samsung's main strategy here should be to lean on sales of the Galaxy S6 Edge and Galaxy Note 5. Both phones offer a different physical shape and features (a curved screen and a stylus, respectively) than the iPhone does, in a parallel of the way that the Galaxy S4 and Note 2 and 3 offered a far bigger screen than the iPhone 5S did.

Alternatively you can say that this merely part of Apple's natural two-year product cycle, and the real action comes with iPhone 7 in 2016, which will once again wipe the floor with whatever Samsung has on the market at the time.

Read next

Jim is the former editor-in-chief of Insider's news division.Previously he was the founding editor of Business Insider UK.He has also been managing editor at Adweek, an advertising columnist at CBS Interactive, and a Knight-Bagehot Fellow at Columbia Business School. His work has appeared in Slate, Salon, The Independent, MTV, The Nation and AOL.His investigative journalism changed the law in the US First Circuit Court of Appeals (U.S. v. Kravetz), the Third Circuit Court of Appeals (North Jersey Media v. Ashcroft), New Jersey (In Re El-Atriss), and New York State (Mosallem v. Berenson).The US Supreme Court cited his work on the death penalty in the concurrence to Baze v. Rees, on the issue of whether lethal injection is cruel or unusual.He won the Neal award for business journalism in 2005 for a series investigating bribes and kickbacks in the advertising business.Here's a selection of his past stories:   • The alleged betrayal in these photos, texts, and emails cost Snapchat $158 million   • Inside the conspiracy that forced Dov Charney out of American Apparel   • The Evolution of Ev: The creator of Twitter, Blogger, and Medium has a plan to fix the mess he made of the internet   • THE "KNOCK-IN SHORT": Nigel Farage and the massive bet against the pound on the night of the Brexit vote   • eBay worked with the FBI to put its top affiliate marketer in prison   • How Dunkin Donuts ended up hiring a psychotic credit card thief as director of communications   • BEJEWELED: The definitive, illustrated history of the most underrated game ever   • The CEO of Publicis told us how he stared down a furious internal rebellion to bet the future of his $11 billion company on artificial intelligence   • FBX: The billion-dollar Facebook business that never happened   • The €150 million check-kiting scam that bankrupted Leo Burnett in Greece   • My Polaroids of the September 11 attacks led me into America's secret court system for terrorist suspects   • YouTube deleted 130 rap videos to help police fight street gangs responsible for thousands of stabbingsDisclosure: I own shares of Twitter (TWTR).